Description: The analysis of modern scientific and methodological approaches to the definition of a rational composition of tactical groups. It has been revealed that modern methods, by definition of the ratio of forces and means of the parties, are based on the calculation of the combat potential, do not take into account the energy-technical potentials of arms and military equipment, and also do not take into account the bioenergy potentials of the units of these groups. It also revealed the absence of recommenda-tions on the creation of an organizational-staff structure of a military formation that can cover and perform a specific specific range of tasks that can be performed not only by units of the Armed Forces, but also by those belonging to other power structures of the state. Recommendations on the creation of interspecific tactical groups were developed, and their content was presented on the formation of a rational combat composition, the organization of command and control, the acquisition of weapons and military equipment, as well as on the training of units that are part of an interspecific tactical group. In developing the recom-mendations, a methodology was used to determine the composition of an interspecific tactical group based on the calculation of the combat potential, which takes into account the fire, protective, power engineering, and bioenergetic potentials of each unit and weapon of the interspecific tactical group. The definition of a variant of the composition of an interspecific tactical group and recommendations for its creation was carried out taking into account the conditions when maneuvering defense on a broad front, offensive and stabilization actions. The implementation of the developed recommendations will provide an opportunity to increase the effectiveness of the combat use of interspecific tactical groups, in comparison with the basic divisions. Developed recommendations on the creation of interspecific tactical groups can be used by military control bodies to form the combat com-position of an interspecific tactical group, depending on their real fighting capabilities in the context of modern combat opera-tions, as well as when performing a specific range of tasks.
Keywords: interspecific tactical groups, combat potential, maneuverable defense, stabilization actions, combat composi-tion, command and control, tactical operations center.
1.Garbar, O., Konopkin, A., Korenkov, O., Movchan, S., Pavlichenko, O. and Martynenko, O. (2018), “Zbrojnyj konflikt vUkrayini: vijskova pidtrymka nezakonnyh zbrojnyh formuvan “DNR” ta “LNR” z boku Rosijskoyi Federaciyi” [Armed conflict in Ukraine: military support of the illegal armed forces “DPR” and “LPR” by the Russian Federation], Ukrainian Helsinki Human Rights Union, Kyiv, 40 p., available at: www.helsinki.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/New.pdf.
2.The official site of Ministry of Defence of Ukraine (2019), “Analiz bojovyh dij na shodi Ukrayiny v hodi zymovoyikampaniyi 2014–2015 rokiv” [Analysis of combat operations in eastern Ukraine during the 2014-2015 winter campaign], available at: www.mil.gov.ua/news/2015/12/23/analiz-bojovih-dij-na-shodi-ukraini-v-hodi-zimovoi-kampanii-2014-2015-rokiv--16785/.
3.General Staff of the Forces of Ukraine (2013), “Zbirnyk operatyvnyh i taktychnyh prykladiv dij vijsk (syl) u zbrojnyhkonfliktah suchasnosti” [Digest of operational and tactical examples of the forces in the armed conflicts of our time], Kyiv, 135 p.
4.Stryzhevskyj, V.V. (2006), “Rozvytok zagalnoyi taktyky v lokalnyh vijnah i zbrojnyh konfliktah drugoyi polovyny 20 tana pochatku 21 stolit” [Development of common tactics in local wars and armed conflicts in the second half of the 20th and early 21st centuries], National Academy of Defense of Ukraine, Kyiv, 272 p.
5.Vladymyrov, V. (2004), “Nazemnaya operacyya vooruzhennyh syl SShA y yh soyuznykov protyv Yraka” [Groundoperation of US forces and their allies against Iraq], Foreign Military Review, No. 1, Moscow, pp. 24-28.
6.Telelym, V.M., Zagorka, O.M. and Stryzhevskyj, V.V. (2012), “Dosvid stvorennya ta zastosuvannya ugrupovan vijsk(syl) u lokalnyh vijnah i zbrojnyh konfliktah drugoyi polovyny 20 ta na pochatku 21 stolittya” [The experience of creating and using groups of troops (forces) in local wars and armed conflicts in the second half of the 20th and early 21st centuries], National Academy of Defense of Ukraine, Kyiv, 336 p.
7.Stryzhevskyj, V.V. and Pochynok, S.M. (2012), “Metodyka vyznachennya skladu tymchasovyh vijskovyh formuvan,pryznachenyh dlya prykryttya dilyanok derzhavnogo kordonu” [Methodology for determining the composition of temporary military formations intended to cover areas of the state border], Center for military-strategic research of National Academy of Defense of Ukraine, No. 2, Kyiv, pp. 96-99.
8.Zagorka, O.M., Tymoshenko, R.I., Kolesnikov, V.O. and Zagorka, I.O. (2014), “Osnovni pryncypy stvorennyaoperatyvnogo (mizhvidovogo) ugrupovannya vijsk (syl) zbalansovanogo skladu dlya vidbyttya agresiyi” [Basic principles of creating an operational (interstitial) grouping of forces (forces) of a balanced composition to reflect aggression], Digest of Scientific Works of Central Research Institute of The Armed Force of Ukraine, No. 1(67), Kyiv, pp. 53-59.
9.Guzchenko, S.V. and Yarosh, S.P. (2014), “Obgruntuvannja pokaznykiv bojovykh mozhlyvostej mizhvydovykhtaktychnykh ghrup” [Substantiation of indicators of combat capabilities of interspecific tactical groups], Systems of Arms and Military Equipment, No. 4(40), pp. 63-67.
10.The Armed Force of Ukraine (2016), “Boiovyi statut mekhanizovanykh i tankovykh viisk Sukhoputnykh viisk ZbroinykhSyl Ukrainy. Chastyna 2 (batalion (rota))” [Military Status of the Mechanized and Tank Army of the Land Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Part 2( battalion (company))], Kyiv, 351 p.
11.NATO Standardization Office (2016), Allied Tactical Publication 3.2.2. Command and control of allied land forces,Brussels, Belgium, 263 p.
12.Headquarters Department of the Army (2016), Field Manual 6-0. Commander and Staff Organization and Operations,Washington, 394 p.