Description: The subject matter of the article is the existing software solutions for the integrated use of spatial information. The goal is to study and analyze certain decisions that are implemented in geoinformation systems in order to use them for geoinformation support at the tactical level. The tasks are: to study and analyze the capabilities of individual samples of geoinformation support software, and to determine the peculiarities of implementation in them algorithms for data collection, systemization, accumula-tion and visualization. The methods used are: statistical analysis methods, optimization methods, modeling methods, methods for constructing complex systems. The following results were obtained. It is established that the pressing issue is - the use of a geoin-formation platform for collecting, processing, analyzing, accumulating geospatial data and providing access and exchange of data between users of different levels and destinations. This article presents the results of studying and analyzing the capabilities of individual samples of geoinformation support software, which can be used in the creation of automated tactical level control systems. In particular, the necessary solutions for the tactical level of implementation are to some extent implemented in such software products (services) as: the universal Liveuamap awareness map; Delta Monitor; Delta Drive; Special Mars software; Special Combat vision software; Casper EEMZ information system. Conclusions. Ukraine has accumulated some experience in creating and using tactical-level software for commanders (headquarters). A characteristic feature of the geoinformation plat-forms under consideration is that they are created using different software tools, using different approaches to data collection, systemization, accumulation and visualization. The conducted research shows the positive tendencies of introduction of geoin-formation technologies in the processes of gathering, accumulation and display of operational information in the sphere of man-agement decisions, but reveal the need for further research on the problem of defining certain approaches to their integration and use of information resources at once from several existing geoinformation.
Keywords: geoinformation system, geoinformation support, decision making, specialized software, management of spatial-distributed information.
1.Stryzhak, O., Prychodniuk, V. and Podlipaiev, V. (2019), Model of Transdisciplinary Representation of GEOspatial In-formation, Advances in Information and Communication Technologies. UKRMICO 2018, Vol. 560, pp. 34-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16770-7_3.
2.Stryzhak, O. (2014), “Transdystsyplinarna intehratsiia informatsiinykh resursiv” [Transdisciplinary integration of in-formation resources: abstract of dissertation], Kyiv, 47 p.
3.Palagin, A.V. (2014), “Transdystsyplynarnost, informatyka i razvytye sovremennoi tsyvylyzatsii” [Transdisciplinarity,computer science and the development of modern civilization], Bulletin of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, No. 7, pp. 25-33, available at: www.nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/vnanu_2014_7_6.
4.Sozinov, M. (2017), “Yspoljzovanye semantyky v strateghyy setecentrycheskogho obmena dannymy Mynysterstva obo-rony SShA” [Using semantics in the US Department of Defense network-centric data sharing strategy], available at: https://primesoftpro.ru/blog/informatsionnye/material_60//.
5.Stryzhak, A.E. (2014), “Ontolohycheskie aspekty transdystsyplynarnoi intehratsii informatsyonnykh resursov” [Onto-logical aspects of transdisciplinary integration of information resources], Open Information and Computer Integrated Technolo-gies, No. 65, pp. 211-223, available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/vikt_2014_65_24.
6.Velichko, V.Yu., Malakhov, K.S., Semenkov, V.V. and Stryzhak, A.E. (2014), “Kompleksnye instrumentalnye sred-stva inzhenerii ontolohii” [Integrated Ontology Engineering Tools], International Journal Information Models and Analyses, No. 3(4), pp. 336-361, available at: www.foibg.com/ijima/vol03/ijima03-04-p03.pdf.
7.Palagin, A.V., Kryvyi, S.L. and Petrenko, N.G. (2012), “Ontolohycheskye metody i sredstva obrabotki predmetnykhznanii” [Ontological methods and means of processing subject knowledge], Lugansk, 323 p.
8.Dovgyi, S.O., Bidiuk, P.I. and Trofimchuk, O.M. (2014), “Systemy pidtrymky pryiniattia rishen na osnovi statystychno-ymovirnisnykh metodiv” [Acceptance systems take advantage based on statistical and statistical methods], Kyiv, 419 p.
9.(2004), OWL WebOntologyLanguage, available at: www.w3.org/TR/owl-guide/.
10.Andon,F.I., Grishanova, I.Yu. and Reznichenko, V.A. (2008), “Semantic Web kak novaia model informatsyonnohoprostranstva internet” [Semantic Web as a new model of the Internet information space], Programming problems, No. 2-4, pp. 417-430, available at: www.dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/1414.
11.The official site of “Liveuamap” (2019), Live Universal Awareness Map, available at: https://liveuamap.com.
12.Abrosymova, E. (2015), “Ystoryia startapa: kak interaktyvnaia karta sobytii v Ukraine Liveuamap prevratylas v mirovoimediaresurs” [Startup history: as an interactive map of events in Ukraine Liveuamap has become a global media resource], avail-able at: https://ain.ua/2015/01/18/istoriya-startapa-kak-sobytiya-v-ukraine-pomogli-liveuamap-prevratitsya-v-mirovoj-mediaresurs/.
13.The official site of COMBAT.VISION (2016), “Kljuchovi mozhlyvosti” [Key Opportunities], available at:www.combat.vision/.
14.The official site of COMBAT.VISION (2016), “Systema planuvannia, rozvidky ta koordynatsii na poli boiu. Prykladyzastosuvannia” [Combat Planning, Intelligence and Coordination System, KomBat Application Examples], available at: www.combat.vision/upload/app/Manual_ usecases.ru.pdf.